Feedback

Please note, plagiarism is not checked at this stage but will be for final submission in January || Negatives: Each Member should have created his/her own page on the wiki where to upload papers as well as drafts. Each member should work on the layout of his/her page as this will allow and show improvement in IT skills. Part of the final mark for the case study will be on presentation, this will include how nicely laid out the wiki is, and how ‘reader-friendly’ it is. Make sure you work on the layout as this will also show improvement on your IT skills. Individual topics: IA: Good start, make sure you reference each picture and mention it on the main text. The facts you mention are interesting but need to be linked and discussed. Make sure you support your statements with references throughout the text E. Some interesting facts are mentioned but make sure you focus on L. disease not pneumonia in general as the latter is caused by several infectious agents. Use pictures to support your discussion and discuss the facts you report, why did you choose them? Why are they significant? CA. The main symptoms are mentioned but there are some repetition and it risks to read more like a description rather than a discussion. What is interesting about the symptoms and how are they connected to the infection? Check the picture upload T. Good start, good number of references but you can be more precise (e.g. previously when? quantify ‘high level of mortality’). Make sure you refer to tables and figures on the main text and upload them so that they are visible. Check the structure, I think your last part could go at the beginning. ||
 * 7/11/11
 * ** Group number ** ||  ** Feedback **  ||  ** Suggestions for improvement **  ||
 * **B** || Positives:
 * The group published 3 sets of minutes.
 * Everyone was present to 2 of the 3 meetings.
 * A wiki was created and most members published their work and references on it.
 * The wiki is basic but already has a clear structure with individual pages. Plus each page is linked to its author.
 * Nothing was uploaded in one of the pages
 * no discussion took place though the wiki
 * it is not clear who the group leader is
 * only 2 members seem to have joined the wiki || Members should all join the wiki and contribute to discussion.